Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM VIR SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Vir Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 2500 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2476 (14 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version 8 or 10 miscreants discharged shots consequently one person received injury. According to the post mortem examination report the deceased has received one firearm wound of entry. It has not been specified whose shot hit the deceased. The co-accused Sonu Prasher has been released on bail by another bench of this court on 7.10.2006 in criminal misc. bail application no. 10588 of 2006 and the co-accused Raju has been released on bail by this court on 1.11.2006 in criminal misc. bail application no. 22772 of 2006.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Ram Vir Singh  involved in case crime no. 106  of 2005  under Sections 147,148,149, 307 and 302     I.P.C.,     P.S.  Jasrana  District   Firozabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two  sureties  to the satisfaction of the Court concerned on the following condition :

1)given report at the concerned police station on every Sunday at the time fixed by the in charge of the concerned police station.

2)He will not tamper the evidence.

3)He will not leave the district Firozabad without the prior permission of the C.J.M. Firozabad.

4)He shall co-operate with the trial in default it shall be open to the learned C.J.M. Concerned to cancel the bail application of the applicant.

Dated: 14.2.2007

NA/2500/07  


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.