Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KHAPATTU versus LAKSHMAN & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Khapattu v. Lakshman & Others - SECOND APPEAL No. 2711 of 1982 [2007] RD-AH 2545 (15 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 19

Second Appeal No. 2711 of 1982

Kharpattu.................................................................Plaintiff-Appellant.

            Versus

Lachhman and others...............................................Defendants-Respondents.

              ******

Hon. S.P. Mehrotra, J.

It appears that Civil Misc. (Abatement) Application No. 7766 of 2007 has been filed on behalf of the defendant-respondent No.3, inter-alia,  praying that the Second Appeal be dismissed as having abated.

The aforesaid Abatement Application is accompanied by an Affidavit, sworn on 9th January, 2007.

It is, inter-alia, stated in the said Affidavit that Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant) died on 15-12-1990 ; and that the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant) died issue-less ; and that there is no other heir or legal  representative of the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant) ; and that no Substitution Application has been filed for substituting the heirs and legal representatives of the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant).

Copy of the aforesaid Abatement Application was served on 9-1-2007 in the Office of  Sri Uma Kant, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant.

In view of the averments made in the aforesaid Abatement Application and its accompanying Affidavit, the Court, by its order dated 31st January, 2007, directed the Office to submit Report as to whether any Substitution Application had been filed on behalf of the heirs and legal representatives of the  said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant).

Pursuant to the said order dated 31st January, 2007, the Office has submitted its Report dated 14th February, 2007.

A perusal of the said Office Report shows that no  Substitution Application has so far been filed on behalf of the heirs and legal representatives of the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant), consequent to the death of the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant).

In view of the above, the Second Appeal, at the instance of the said Kharpattu (plaintiff-appellant), stands abated.

The said Kharpattu  was the sole plaintiff-appellant. Therefore, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as having abated.

Dt. 15-02-2007/AK/L


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.