Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KALLU AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRY., U.P. URBAN DEVELOPMENT & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kallu And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., U.P. Urban Development & Others - WRIT - A No. 8530 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2620 (19 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

      Court No. 1

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8530 of 2007

                             Kallu and others                    

                         versus      

                 State of U.P. and others

                ~~~~

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The Standing Counsel has accepted notices on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 4 while Sri Chandan Sharma, Advocate has accepted notices on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

From the record it is disclosed that petitioner no. 1 is himself a retired Class IV employee while petitioner nos. 2 to 5 are widows of retired employees and petitioner no. 6 is the son of retired employee of Kanpur Nagar Nigam, Kanpur. Their grievance is that the respondent-Nagar Nigam has stopped paying their pension since January 2006 and is not releasing their pension despite making joint representation to the Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar dated 8.1.2006.

    An employee is entitled to retiral/post-death benefits for which formalities have to be got completed by the department where he served before the date of retirement/after the death in harness of the employee. Non-payment of retrial/post-death dues is hit by Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

        In the circumstances, the respondents are directed either to pay the aforesaid dues of the petitioners with interest from due date till the date of payment within a period of 6 weeks from today or they may show cause within the aforesaid period filing counter affidavit.

In case the cause is not shown by filing counter affidavit within the time granted by this Court, respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall be personally present in Court on the date fixed.  

List this case after expiry of the aforesaid period.

Dated 19.2.2007

rpk/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.