Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RADHEY SHYAM UPADHYAY versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY. GOVT. OF UP & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Radhey Shyam Upadhyay v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Govt. Of Up & Others - WRIT - A No. 32211 of 2002 [2007] RD-AH 2878 (21 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.

The petitioner's initial appointment  was made in the year 1971 as Basic Health Worker. Thereafter he has been sent on deputation  under Panchayat Raj Department as multi purpose employee. While working under Panchayat Raj Department, he was suspended on 19.5.2000 under  contemplation  of enquiry. The Chief Medical Officer, Mathura  has passed an order to the effect that if the petitioner deposits Rs. 35,537/- in advance  he be permitted to join.  Through this order his three future increments have also been stopped.

A Counter affidavit has been filed by learned Standing Counsel in which it is stated that the same offence F.I.R. has also been lodged against the petitioner. However, he has not disputed  the factum of the order dated 19.5.2000.

Today learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before the Court that she wants to withdraw  the writ petition with the liberty to move an application for joining without challenging the impugned order dated 19.5.2000. She further submits that since the petitioner has not been able to join after 2000 and he is under financial crunch, therefore, the amount of Rs.34,537/-  may be taken in instalments.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the state respondents.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner  is out of employment for the year 2000. It is provided that if the petitioner moves an application for joining  with Rs.5000/-. He may be permitted  by the Chief Medical Officer, Mathura to join and after his joining the rest amounts may be taken in easy instalment for that purpose  he may moved an application  before the Competent authority  i.e. Chief Medical Officer who shall fix the appropriate instalment for deduction of amount from the petitioner's salary.

With this observation, the writ petition is dismissed.

Dt.21.2.2007.

Rkb.32211/02


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.