High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Balram Misthan Bhandar Thru' Its Occupier v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secry. Chld Labour And Others - WRIT - C No. 9755 of 2007  RD-AH 2945 (22 February 2007)
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. No notice is being issued is being issued to the respondent no. 3 in view of the order which is being passed.
By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the recovery citation dated 16.1.2007 sent by the Deputy Labour Commissioner to the Collector, Jalaun for recovering Rs. 20,000/- as compensation under the Child Labour ( Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that no notice was served to the petitioner and the notice dated 12.12.2006 referred to in the recovery certificate was never served on the petitioner.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and the submission made no useful purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending. Ends of justice will be served in permitting the petitioner to file detailed reply before the respondent no. 2 within one month from today which may be considered and disposed of by the Deputy Labour Commissioner within a further period of two months. Till the decision is taken by the Deputy Labour Commissioner the recovery notice dated 16.1.2007 shall be kept in abeyance. However, it will be open for the respondent to proceed and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.