Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Rajendra Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 8019 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 303 (5 January 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble V.K. Verma, J.

Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 711 of 2007.

Sri Sushil Kumar Tiwari, Advocate has filed his memo of appearance today on behalf of the complainant; the same is taken on record. When the case is listed next, his name shall also be shown in the cause list as counsel for the complainant.

We have heard Sri L.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Sushil Kumar Tiwari for the complainant and learned A.G.A. We have gone through the impugned judgment also.

Both the appeals are admitted.

The objection filed on behalf of State under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is taken on record.

The office is directed to summon the trial court record within eight weeks.

It is contended that one Kshtrapal was killed and Ranveer, Smt. Kailaso and Smt. Nattho sustained injuries in the course of incident. The appellants also lodged FIR and set up a cross case alleging therein that Girish Yadav, one of the appellants also sustained injuries and a cross case at crime no. 495-A of 2000 was registered. Both the cases ended in conviction. It is further urged that Ranveer Singh, Deshraj and Pushpendra have already been bailed out by this Court on 19.12.2006.

Considering all facts and circumstances of the case and the cross case, we are inclined to release both appellants on bail during pendency of appeal.

Let the appellants-Rajendra Singh and Girish Yadav be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Moradabad in S.T. No. 252 of 2001 State Vs. Girish Yadav and others.

Both the appellants are directed to deposit the entire amount of fine in the court below within a period of eight weeks from today.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.