Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

YOGESH KUMAR SAXENA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRY., MEDICAL & HEALTH & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Yogesh Kumar Saxena v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., Medical & Health & Others - WRIT - A No. 9176 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3244 (26 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petiitoner that his father was a Class IV employee working in the respondent-Medical College. He died in harness on 30.6.2001. On attaining the age of majority, the petitioner had applied on 1.6.2006 for being appointed on compassionate grounds under the Dying in Harness  Rules, 1974. The learned counsel for the petitioner  submits that thereafter the petitioner has submitted several representations/reminders but no decision has yet been taken on his application dated 1.6.2006.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the  Superintendent, S.N.Medical College, Agra, Respondent no.2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.2, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as other dependants of the deceased employee, if there be any, and pass appropriate orders on the said representation as well as application of the petitioner dated 1.6.2006 expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.

dt. 26.2.2007

dps

w.p. 9176.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.