High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Yogesh Kumar Saxena v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., Medical & Health & Others - WRIT - A No. 9176 of 2007  RD-AH 3244 (26 February 2007)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.
It is the case of the petiitoner that his father was a Class IV employee working in the respondent-Medical College. He died in harness on 30.6.2001. On attaining the age of majority, the petitioner had applied on 1.6.2006 for being appointed on compassionate grounds under the Dying in Harness Rules, 1974. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter the petitioner has submitted several representations/reminders but no decision has yet been taken on his application dated 1.6.2006.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the Superintendent, S.N.Medical College, Agra, Respondent no.2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.2, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as other dependants of the deceased employee, if there be any, and pass appropriate orders on the said representation as well as application of the petitioner dated 1.6.2006 expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the same.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.