CHIRANGI @ SAPPAL versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Chirangi @ Sappal v. State Of U.P. & Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 4048 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3261 (27 February 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

This application has been filed  by the applicant  Chiranji alias Sappal against the order dated 1.12.2006 passed by the Ist Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division)  Jyotiba phule Nagar in case no.  168 of 2006 by which the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been allowed and the officer in charge of the Police Station concerned has been directed to register a case and investigate the same.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the impugned order is illegal, it has not been passed in accordance with the provisions of law.

It has been rebutted by the learned A.G.A.by submitting that  there is no illegality in the impugned order because on the basis of the allegations made in the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a prima facie cognizable offence is made out and the allegations are of such nature which requires investigation. There is no illegality in the impugned order.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and from the perusal of the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C., it appears that on the basis of the allegation made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out and the allegations are of such a nature which requires investigation, the impugned order  is not suffering from any illegality or irregularity, therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.

It is further contended that the applicant is a man of peace loving. He shall cooperate with the investigation. In case, the applicant is arrested and sent to jail during investigation, the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss.  Therefore, the applicant may not be arrested during investigation.

Considering the facts,  circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A, it is directed that the applicant shall not be arrested during investigation of  the case registered in pursuance of the impugned order but the applicant shall cooperate with the investigation.

With this direction this application is finally disposed of.

Dt. 27.2.2007

NA/4048/07

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.