Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARPAL AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harpal And Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 687 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3275 (27 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble R.C.Deepak,J.

Hon'ble K.N.Ojha, J.

Heard Sri G.S.Chaturvedi, learned senior counsel with the assistance of Sri Ajatshatru Pandey,  learned counsel for the appellants-accused, Sri Mewa Lal Shukla, learned AGA for the State and perused the impugned judgment.

It is contended by the  learned counsel for the appellants-accused that the role of exhortation has been attributed to the appellant Niwasi alias Ram Niwas. Similarly the appellant Rajpal alleged to have armed with rifle but he did not appear to have caused any injury on the person of the deceased or the injured as there is no rifle injury.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the appeal is admitted.

Issue notice.

The appellants Rajpal and Niwasi alias Ram Niwas  convicted under Section 148, 302/149, 307/149, 504, 506 IPC in S.T.Nos. 916 of 2000 and 164 of 2001 P.S. Dado Distt. Aligarh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-each  with two sureties each in the like amount  to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The realisation of the fine imposed upon the appellants Rajpal and Niwasi alias Ram Niwas shall remain stayed during the pendency of their appeal before this Hon'ble Court.

Summon the trial court's record within four weeks.

List on 19th April 2007.

The prayer for bail of the appellants accused Harpal, Jaypal, Samant Singh, Avnish, Viresh and Subedar shall be considered after receipt of the record.

Dt/- 27th  February, 2007

PKG/2(687/07)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.