Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANOJ AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manoj And Another v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4474 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3543 (1 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M.K. Mittal, J.

Accused applicants Manoj S/o Late Ram Ratan and Devendra S/o Janki Prasad  have prayed for release on bail in Case Crime No. 443 of 2006, under Section 307 IPC, P.S. Gandhipark, District Aligarh.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

Learned counsel for the accused applicants has contended that role of firing has not been assigned to these applicants whereas that role has been assigned to co accused Mukesh. Although the applicants were arrested at the spot but in view of the fact that firing role has been assigned to co accused they are entitled to be released on bail.

In the circumstances of the present case, but without prejudice to the merit of the case, let the accused involved in above case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The applicants shall furnish an undertaking before the court concerned that they will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and will not cause either any direct or indirect threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and his family members and shall also not tamper with the evidence, If any such report is made by any of the above persons either to the court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into any if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to report to this Court so that their bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 1.3.2007

RKS/4474/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.