Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANJU & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sanju & Others v. State Of U.P. & Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 4260 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3592 (1 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

This application has been filed by the applicants, who are six  in number,  with  a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 17.11.2006 in complaint case 1172 of 2006under sections 147,323,506,452 I.P.C. passed by the Additional  Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1 Aligarh  

From the perusal of the impugned order dated 17.11.2006, it appears that the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance to summon the applicants to face the trial.

There is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants it is directed that in case the applicant No. 1,2,3,4, and 6 appear before the court concerned  within 30 days from today and apply for bail their bail application shall  be considered and disposed of on the same day in accordance with the provisions of law. No coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants for a period of 30 days from today.

So far as respondent no. 5 is concerned her presence is dispensed with till the framing of the charge. Her presence shall be noted through her counsel but she will have to appear on the date fixed for framing of the charge.

With the above direction the application is finally disposed of .

Dt. 1.3.2007

NA/4260/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.