Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

UMAKANT & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Umakant & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 729 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3801 (2 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court. 45

Criminal Appeal No. 729 of 2007

   Umakant & others          ------                      Appellants-accused

versus

State of U.P                      --------                      Respondent.

Connected with

Criminal Appeal No. 769 of 2007

Deen Dayal & others      ----------         Appellants-accused

versus

State of U.P.                              -----           Respondent

                                                  ...........

Hon'ble R.C.Deepak, J.

Hon'ble K.N.Ojha, J.

Objection filed by the State, be taken on record.

Criminal appeal no. 729 of 2007 Umakant & others vs. State of U.P. and Criminal appeal no. 769 of 2007 Deen Dayal & others vs. State of U.P.  arise out of judgment and order dated 23.1.2007  passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Ghazipur in S.T. No. 38 of 1992 under Sections 147, 148, 323/149 and 302/149 IPC pertaining to P.S. Suhaval Distt. Ghazipur and the prayer made therein for their release on bail, is being heard together and is disposed of by a common order.

Heard Sri V.P.Srivastava, learned senior counsel with the assistance of Sri Shri Ram Rawsat, learned counsel for the appellant accused, Sri P.K.Rai, learned counsel for the informant, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the impugned judgment.

It has vehemently been argued by the learned counsel for the appellants accused that the prosecution has not come up with the actual facts of the case leading to the alleged occurrence. In fact the appellants Deen Dayal, Umakant, Munna, Mathuri and non appellant Ashok also sustained injuries including the fracture on the body of Suresh Gupta and in this regard an NCR no. 51 of 1991 was registered. Six persons sustained injuries on the side of the prosecution, one Sarvajeet lost life. His further contention is that some dispute arose in regard to the plucking of the mango and the occurrence is a result of sudden provocation, therefore, the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 IPC is against the express provision of law.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. submit that Sarvajeet suffered two fatal incised wounds caused by Deen Dayal and Umakant with Gandasa, therefore, their case is distinguishable from the case of other co-accused.

Contradicting the arguments of the learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA, learned counsel for the appellants accused further submits that these two appellants also suffered injuries.

We have taken into account the entire facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the merits of the case, we are of the view that the appellants have succeeded in making out a case for their being released on bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal is admitted.

Issue notice.

The appellants Umakant, Munna, Mathuri, Ravindra Prasad, Deen Dayal and Umashanker   convicted under Section 147, 148, 323/149, 302/149 IPC in Sessions Trial No. 38 of 1992  P.S. Suhaval Distt. Ghazipur shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties each in the like amount  to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The realisation of the fine imposed upon the appellants shall remain stayed during the pendency of their appeal before this Court.

Dt/- 02nd  March, 2007

PKG/2 (729/07)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.