Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM NARENDRA VERMA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRETARY & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Narendra Verma v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secretary & Others - WRIT - A No. 12006 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 3865 (7 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 39

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12006 of 2007

Ram Narendra Verma

Versus

State of U.P and others

Hon'ble V.K.Shukla,J.

Petitioner has approached this Court questioning the validity of the finding of fact recorded by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Harraiya District Basti holding that petitioner is resident of Pikuraram Lal and is not at all resident of Bankatwajot Kainahipur and the residential certificate which has been obtained is incorrect residential certificate.

Sri Vinay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner contended with vehemence that in the present case opinion which has been formed is incorrect opinion and as such impugned order is liable to be set aside by this Hon'ble Court.

From the side of the respondents as well as Caveator, Sri A.K. Srivastava, Advocate it has been contended that this Court is not Court of Appeal and competent authority has recorded categorical finding of fact and same warrants no interference by this Court.

After respective arguments have been advanced, factual position which is emerging is to the effect that enquiry was got conducted by the Tehsildar Harraiya and report was submitted on 23.12.2006. In the said report it has been mentioned that petitioner was temporarily  staying at Bankatwajot and he was permanent resident of Pikuraram Lal. This fact also has not been disputed that petitioner's mother is Pradhan of village Pikuraramlal. Once this is factual position and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate who is the competent authority has satisfied himself that petitioner is not at all permanent resident of village Bankatwajot then there is no occasion to interfere with the impugned order canceling the residential certificate of the petitioner, as said decision is neither perverse nor unreasonable.  

Consequently, writ petition as it has been framed and drawn is dismissed.  

Dated 7th March, 2007

Dhruv


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.