High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ravindra Yadav v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 24431 of 2006  RD-AH 409 (8 January 2007)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and Sri P.N. Tripathi and Sri T.N. Tiwari, leaned counsel for the complainant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version the role of firing is assigned to the applicant and co-accused Mahendra but during investigation the first informant and other witnesses stated that the shot discharged by the co-accused Mahendra hit the deceased. The role of exhortation is assigned to the applicant.
In reply of the above contentions it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the complainant that after committing the murder the applicant and other co-accused persons were extending threat to the first informant and other witnesses to withdraw the case. In case he is released on bail he shall tamper with the evidence.
Let the applicant Ravindra Yadav involved in case crime no. 614 of 2006 under Sections 302 I.P.C., and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S. Bhadohi District Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and he shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial t show his good behaviour.
In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel and he shall be taken into custody by the C.J.M. concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.