Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AJIT KUMAR YADAV versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ajit Kumar Yadav v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4975 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 4117 (12 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M.K. Mittal, J.

Accused applicant Ajit Kumar Yadav son of Late Dwarika Yadav has filed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4975 of 2007 and accused applicant Babu Ram Singh son of Late Ram Nath Singh has field Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4976 of 2007. They have prayed for release on bail in Case Crime Nos. 28 of 2007 and 26 of 2007 respectively under Sections 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act, P.S. Kotwali, Districh Chandauli. These applicants have been shown in the same Gang Chart and thereafter their matters are being taken together.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

According to Gang Chart there is one case against the applicant Ajit Kuamr Yadav and two cases are against the Babu Ram Singh.

Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that applicants are on bail in all these cases from competent Court. He has further contended that applicants are not likely to commit any such offence in future which may be punishable under the provisions of Gangster Act.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merit of the case, applicants are entitled to bail.

Let the accused involved in above case crime be released on bail on their furnishing  personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The applicants shall furnish an undertaking before the court concerned that they will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and will not cause either any direct or indirect threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and his family members and shall also not tamper with the evidence.  If any such report is made by any of the above persons either to the court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into and if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to report to this Court so that their bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 12.3.2007

RKS/4975/07

4976/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.