High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Dayanand Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 71064 of 2006  RD-AH 448 (9 January 2007)
Court No. 10
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 71064 of 2006
Dayanand Singh and another . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioners.
State of U.P. and others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Respondents.
Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 16.11.2006 ( Annexure-2 to the writ petition ) passed by respondent no.3 reserving sale center Patai Khadar - B for Chandpur Sugar Mill.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 to 4 as well as Sri S.D.Singh appearing for respondent no. 5, who has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court.a
According to Sri S.D.Singh, against the same order an appeal has been preferred by the aggrieved party, namely, Kisan Sahakari Sugar Mill Ltd. Gajaraula and it is to be decided by the Special Secretary, Cane Development, Government of U.P. Lucknow. It is submitted that the aforesaid apapeal filed by the aggrieved party before the Special Secretary is pending for a couple of months.
We do not enter into this dispute. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the said authority for deciding the appeal expeditiously. It is made clear that our order does not create any locus standi to the petitioner which is not contemplated in law.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed .
No order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.