Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAITAN SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shaitan Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25143 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 4586 (15 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Accused applicant Shaitan Singh son of Late Sri Madhoo Singh has prayed for release on bail in Case Crime No. 611 of 2006, under Sections 364-A, 368 IPC, P.S. New Agra, District Agra.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that in this matter co accused Ram Naresh @ Pappu has been directed to be released on bail by order dated 5.1.2007 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 28589 of 2006 by another bench of this court. He has further contended that the applicant is similarly situate.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merits of the case, applicant is entitled to bail.

Let the accused involved in above case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The applicant shall furnish an undertaking before the court concerned that he will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and will not cause either any direct or indirect threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and his family members and shall also not tamper with the evidence.  If any such report is made by any of the above persons either to the court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into and if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to report to this Court so that his bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 15.3.2007

RKS/25143/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.