High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Uma Shanker Yadav v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 13598 of 2007  RD-AH 4622 (15 March 2007)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.
It is the case of the petitioner that he has been working as a seasonal Collection Peon since 1981. He claims that in terms of Rule 5 of U.P. Collection Peon's Service Rules, 2004, 50% of the posts of Collection Peons are to be filled up from amongst the eligible seasonal Collection Peons. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that although posts of Collection Peons are vacant but the case of the petitioner is not being considered despite his having filed several representations in this regard.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the District Magistrate, Kanpur Dehat, Respondent no. 2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.3, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the same.
With the aforesaid observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.