Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LALMAN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lalman v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 126 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 466 (9 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

This appeal has been filed by Lalman against the judgement and order dated 8.12.2006 passed by Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area Act, Court No. 3, Banda in Special Trial No. 14 of 2006 whereby the appellant has been found guilty and convicted under Section 307/34  IPC and  Section 12 of D.A.A. Act and Section 25 Arms Act and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to four  years and fine has also been imposed on him with default stipulation.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgement.

Admit.

Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that accused is alleged to have fired at Police party but none was injured in the incident. He has further contended that he has been falsely implicated in this case and the learned Trial Court has not made proper appreciation of the evidence on record.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merits of the case, appellant be released on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

He shall also deposit the amount of fine as imposed on him and shall also furnish an undertaking that he will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and if any report is found against him it shall be open for the court below to report to this Court so that his bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 9.1.2007

RKS/126/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.