Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S S.K. JAIN AND COMPANY versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S S.K. Jain And Company v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 70699 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 470 (9 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 10

    Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 70699 of 2006

M/S. S.K.Jain & Company  . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . .  . . . . . . Petitioner.

                                    Versus

State of U.P. and others . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . ..Respondents.

                                         ----

Hon'ble A.K. Yog,J.

Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.

This is a writ petition for  a direction to the respondents to extend/renew the term of the petitioner  by virtue of clause 20 of the agreements regarding appointment of Coordinator  ( Annexures 1 and 2 to the writ petition ).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjiv Singh holding brief of Sri P.S. Baghel for respondents no. 2 and 3 as well as  the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

The main grievance of the petitioner  is that application dated 30.11.2006 for extension/renewal  of the agreement of the petitioner to work as Coordinator as per appointment/agreement  ( Annexures 1 and 2 to the writ petition ) is still pending and has not been decided  by the concerned authority.

In view of the above,  we direct respondents no. 2 and 3  as well as other competent authority, if any, to decide the petitioner's application dated 30.11.2006 ( Annexure no. 7 to the writ petition ) within seven days from today by passing a reasoned  order as warranted  on the facts and circumstances of the case. It is further directed that request of the petitioner firm for its continuance as Coordinator as on date till decision of the said application may also be considered  by respondent no.2

Writ Petition is finally disposed of subject to the above directions.

No order as to costs.

Let a certified copy of this order be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner today on payment of usual charges.

Dated: 9.1.2007

RPP.                                                                            


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.