High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Tej Bahadur Yadav v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - A No. 14371 of 2007  RD-AH 4717 (16 March 2007)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.
It is the case of the petitioner that he was initially engaged as seasonal Collection Amin in the year 1986 and has since then been continuously working. It has been submitted that in terms of Rule 5 of the U.P.Collection Amin's Service Rules, 35% of the posts of Collection Amins are to be filled up from amongst the seasonal Collection Amins. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of seniority, the petitioner would be entitled to such appoointment as Collection Amin but his case has been ignored despite the petitioner having filed several representations in this regard.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before Collector, Deoria, Respondent no.2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.2, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the same.
With the aforesaid observation/direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.