Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHYAM LAL PANDEY versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shyam Lal Pandey v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - A No. 14586 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 4797 (19 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel appearing for the Respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The petitioner claims that he has been working as Range Clerk/Forester in the office of Respodnent no. 4 since July, 1989. He claims that in terms of U.P.Regularizationof Daily Wages Appointments on Group-C Posts Rules, 1998 he is entitled to be regularized in service on Group-C post but his case for such regularization has yet not been consdiered. With regard to such grievances the petiitoner claims that he has filed several representations before the respondent-authorities which have yet not been decided.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case if, with  regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before Conservator of Forest, Bundelkhand Circle, Jhansi, Respondent no.3, along with a certified copy of this order,  the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.3, in accordance with law after taking into account all the relevant records relating to the case of the petiitoner, as expeditiously  as possible, preferably within two months from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.

dt. 19.3.2007

dps

w.p. 14586.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.