Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LAL SINGH & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lal Singh & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 15311 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 4994 (21 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri U.S. Mishra, counsel for the Bank.

The petitioners had taken loan for agricultural purposes. According to the petitioners they could not pay the instalments due to unavoidable circumstances and the loan is being recovered by coercive means. It is submitted that if reasonable time is allowed to pay the amount sought to be recovered in instalments, petitioners may be able to pay the same and irreparable injury on account of arrest and auction of property may be avoided.

To the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for contesting respondent submits that although in some of the cases it has been said that against the recovery proceedings, unless some illegality is pointed out, the court may not interfere, but at the same time submission is that intention of the respondent bank has been never to cause any irreparable injury to the loanee rather the loan amount was advanced with the purpose to improve their future prospects and thus if for justifiable reason the amount in terms of the agreement has not been paid and now petitioners have bona fide intention to pay the amount within a reasonable time then  respondents may not have any objection.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of finally with the following directions:-

(i) Petitioners may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly with the contesting respondent no. 4 Bank in two equal instalments.  In calculating the arrears the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

(ii) The first instalment may be deposited by 21st April 2007 and the last/second instalment by 21st May 2007. In case instalments are deposited with the contesting respondent within the aforesaid time then the recovery charges will not be recovered from the petitioners.

(iii) Petitioners may file an application for supply of statement of account along with duly stamped self- addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the contesting respondents will give the same to the petitioners within fifteen days after the deposit of first instalment.

iv) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioners if attached will be released after the deposit of first instalment by the concerned authority unless it has already been auctioned.

(v)   If the petitioners deposit the instalment as fixed by this Court in time the recovery shall be kept in abeyance but if the petitioners default in paying any of the instalment this order shall stand vacated.        

(vi) This order will not be applicable if the petitioners have filed any earlier writ petition challenging the recovery of this loan.

Dated: 21.3.2007.

s/wp-15311/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.