Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHAWAN YADAV versus THE STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRETARY DEPTT.OF HOME AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bhawan Yadav v. The State Of U.P. Thru' Secretary Deptt.Of Home And Others - WRIT - A No. 16859 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 5685 (30 March 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The case of the petitioner is that he is a Sub Inspector of Armed Police and is presently posted at Recruitment Training Centre, Chunar, Mirzapur.  His grievance is that although the suspension order has been set aside but he has not been paid his salary for the period 31.5.2005 to 5.5.2006 during which he remained under suspension. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the Service Rules, once the suspension order has been set aside the petitioner would be entitled to the payment of salary for the suspension period. With regard to such grievances, the petitioner has already filed several representations before the respondent-authorities, which have yet not been decided.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the Inspector General of Police (Training), U.P., Lucknow, respondent no.2 alongwith a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent, in accordance with law, by a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the same.      

It is further provided that in case if the petitioner is found entitled to payment of any dues, the same shall be paid to him within six weeks from the date of decision on the representation of the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to cost.  

Dt/-30.3.2007

Ru

w.p.16859.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.