Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARISH RAM ARYA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPTT. & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harish Ram Arya v. State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secretary, Home Deptt. & Ors. - SPECIAL APPEAL No. 380 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 5804 (2 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Chief Justice's Court

Special Appeal No. 380 of 2007

Harish Ram Arya vs. State of U.P. and others

*****

Counsel for the appellant Mr. Indra Raj Singh

Counsel for the respondents Standing Counsel

*****

Hon'ble H.L. Gokhale,CJ

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan,J

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant was initially working in the Armed Police. Subsequently, he was transferred to Civil Police. Now it so transpires that an altercation took place between two police personnels and it was alleged that the appellant who was present at that time did not take effective steps to stop the same. He has been transferred back to the P.A.C. He was suspended also. This order was challenged to the learned Single Judge and the learned Single Judge has directed the State to file counter affidavit and rejoinder is to be filed thereafter. There is no particular prejudice in terms of salary on going back to the P.A.C.  

3. The grievance of the counsel for the appellant is that no action has been taken against the two other police personnels who were fighting. It is for the police authorities to take action. However, not taking any action against them does not make the action taken against the appellant, in any way, wrong.

4. The counsel for the appellant had assured the learned Single Judge that he will join at the place where he was transferred within ten days. That is recorded in the impugned order. Now he is seeking to challenge that order. We cannot entertain the appeal after giving such an assurance to the learned Single Judge. As far as the suspension is concerned, that has already been interfered by the learned Single Judge.

5. The appeal is dismissed.  

Date:2.4.2007                    (Chief Justice)

RK/          

               (Ashok Bhushan,J)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.