Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHD. YASEEN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohd. Yaseen v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6601 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 5827 (2 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

Accused applicant Mohd. Yaseen son of Mohd. Islam has prayed for release on bail in case crime No 6 of 2007, under Section 3/8 Animal Cruelty Act and Section 429 IPC, P.S. Rajepur, District Farrukhabad.

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that accused is alleged to have been transporting 27 cattle for slaughtering purpose when the police checked the Truck he managed to escape. Subsequently he surrendered.

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that he is only driver as the truck was booked by his owner and truck has already been released and there is no criminal history against the applicant.

In the circumstances, but without prejudice to the merits of the case, applicant is entitled to bail.

Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

The applicant shall furnish an undertaking also before the court concerned that he will not indulge in any criminal activity and will not cause either any threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and their family members. If any such report is made by any of the above person either to the Court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into and if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to take necessary legal action against the applicant.

Dated: 2.4.2007

RKS/6601/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.