Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THE COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX,U.P. versus S/S RADICO KHETAN LTD.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


The Commissioner Trade Tax,U.P. v. S/S Radico Khetan Ltd. - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. 664 of 1999 [2007] RD-AH 5882 (2 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

Dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "Dealer") claimed to have purchased plant, machinery and building etc. from M/s Shaw Scott Distillery Pvt. Ltd., Rampur and in pursuance thereof the recovery proceedings relating to the dues for the assessment year 1980-81 and 81-82 against M/s Shaw Scott Distillery Pvt. Ltd., Rampur initiated against the dealer.  Tribunal decided the issue in favour of the dealer and held that the amount is not recoverable from the dealer. Challenging the said order present revisions have been filed. Dealer filed the counter affidavit. In para 15 and 16 it has been stated that the demand for the assessment year 1981-82 has been set aside by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Moradabad  vide order dated 30.03.2000 in appeal no.928 of 1991. Copy of the order of Tribunal is annexure CA-3.In para 17 of the counter affidavit it has been stated that for the assessment year 1980-81 Trade Tax Tribunal, Moradabad vide order dated 07.05.1999 allowed the appeal no.927 of 1991 and remanded back the matter to the first appellate authority to decide the matter on merit.

Learned Standing Counsel though filed the rejoinder affidavit but in rejoinder affidavit it has not been stated that what happened after the remand of the case relating to the assessment year 1980-81. Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted three weeks time to  enquire whether the order passed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 1980-81 has been accepted by the department and what happened in appeal after the remand of the case.

Dt.02.04.07

R./664/99


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.