High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17244 of 2007  RD-AH 5918 (3 April 2007)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner is claiming appointment on Class III post in the office of the respondent no. 2. His case is that 37 persons have already been appointed on Class III posts but the case of the petitioner has been ignored.
The posts in Government offices are filled up, in accordance with law, and not on directions issued by the authorities or Court. In such circumstances, it is provided that as and when there is any vacancy on Class III post, which is to be filled up, the same may be done, in accordance with law and the case of the petitioner be also considered alongwith other candidates, who may apply for the same.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.