Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NARENDRA SINGH YADAV versus STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, P.W.D., LUCKNOW & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Narendra Singh Yadav v. State Of U.P. Through Secretary, P.W.D., Lucknow & Others - WRIT - C No. 17175 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 5983 (3 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17175 of 2007

Narendra Singh Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others

*****

Counsel for the petitioner:    Mr. Tarun Verma

Counsel for the respondents:  Standing Counsel

*****

Hon'ble H.L. Gokhale,CJ

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan,J

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner was entrusted with the responsibility of collecting the toll tax on a bridge in district Jhansi. He was in arrears with respect to the collection made in the year 2004-2005 to the tune of Rs.385/- and Rs. 1,35,485/- in the year 2005-2006. The rule provides that in such an eventuality, a fine to the tune of 10% of the total amount can be imposed, which has been so imposed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is on higher side.

3. In any case, without prejudice to his submission, the petitioner is ready to deposit the principal amount within two weeks. If that is so, the petitioner may deposit Rs. 385 + Rs. 1,35,485/- with 9% interest within two weeks whereafter his submission can be examined.

4. We make it clear that if the petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amounts, the petition will automatically stand dismissed without any further hearing.

5. Presuming that he will deposit the amount as assured, the petition may stand adjourned to 24.4.2007.

6. In view of the statement made as above, the recovery will stand stayed until the next date of hearing.

Date:3.4.2007

RK/                                (Chief Justice)

                           (Ashok Bhushan,J)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.