Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Ganga Sagar Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 17997 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6207 (5 April 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

         Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Srivastava holding brief of Sri Satish Chaturvedi , counsel for the Bank.

The petitioner had taken a loan from the State Bank of India. It appears that the petitioner defaulted and according to the petitioner the tractor has been taken possession of by the bank through a private agency.  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners is ready to deposit the dues of the bank provides some reasonable time to deposit the amount is granted. Sri R.B. Sahai learned counsel for the bank states that he has no objection.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of finally with the following directions:-

(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly with the contesting respondent no. 3 Bank in three equal instalments.  In calculating the arrears the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

(ii) The first instalment may be deposited by 5th May 2007, second by 6th August 2007 and the last/third instalment by 5th November  2007. In case instalments are deposited with the contesting respondent within the aforesaid time then the recovery charges will not be recovered from the petitioner.

(iii) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account along with duly stamped self- addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the contesting respondent will give the same to the petitioner within fifteen days after the deposit of first instalment.

iv) After the payment of the first instalment the tractor of the petitioner if not sold will be returned by the concerned authority to the petitioner.

(v)   If the petitioner deposits the instalment as fixed by this Court in time no recovery charges will be taken from the petitioner but if the petitioner defaults in paying any of the instalment this order shall stand vacated.        

(vi) This order will not be applicable if the petitioner has filed any earlier writ petition challenging the recovery of this loan.

Dated: 5.4.2007.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.