High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Mustak Ahmed Raza v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17901 of 2007  RD-AH 6231 (5 April 2007)
Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the record.
It is the case of the petitioner that he was engaged on daily wage basis as a driver by the Respondent no.3 with effect from 1.1.2004. The petitioner claims that the Respondent no.3 has stopped taking work from the petitioner since November, 2006. The petitioner has not filed the order of appointment/engagement or the order of dismissal from service. In such view of the matter he has not been able to establish that he was ever appointed on any post. In support of his claim the petitioner has filed the Log Book. In my view, to establish his claim, if any, the petitioner would have to adduce evidence which cannot be done in writ jurisdiction. As such in the absence of any proof that the petitioner has ever been validly engaged, I would not be inclined to entertain this writ petition.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the petitioner shall have the liberty to approach such other forum available to him in law for redressal of his grievances.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.