Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SOHAMBAR SINGH MALIK versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sohambar Singh Malik v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17866 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6279 (5 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioner that he retired from the service as Kisan Sahayak on 31.1.2006. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to payment of pension and other retiral dues but despite the petitioner having completed all formalities in this regard, the same has not been paid to him even though more than a year has passed. It has been submitted that because of non payment of retiral dues the petitioner is suffering irreparably. With regard to such grievances the petitioner has already field representations which have yet not been decided by the respondent authorities.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before Deputy Director Agriculture (Extension), Saharanpur, Respondent no.4, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.4, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of filing of the same. Whatever amount is found due, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within six weeks of the passing of the order on the representation of the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.

dt. 5.4.2007

dps

w.p. 17866.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.