Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIRENDRA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Virendra Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17826 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6299 (5 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The petitioner is a Platoon Commander in the P.A.C. He went on medical leave on 7.8.2006 but thereafter he is not being permitted to join. The petitioner claims that because he remained ill during this period, he could not join his duties and on the basis of his certificate he is entitled to the grant of medical leave. The petitioner thus contends that he would be entitled to the payment of salary for the said period and also be permitted to join his duties. With regard to such grievances the petitioner the claims that he has already filed representation before the respondent-authorities which have yet not been decided.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the  Commandant, Vith Battalion P.A.C., Meerut, Respondent no.2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.

dt. 5.4.2007

dps

w.p. 17826.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.