Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMIT SHARMA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Amit Sharma v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 18142 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6304 (6 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents.  With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioner that his father was a Constable in the Civil Police. He was declared missing on 22.4.1991. Thereafter on 31.5.1999 the father of the petitioner was declared dead. The family pension and other death-cum-retiral dues of the father of the petitioner late Brijendra Pal Sharma  were given to his heirs. The petitioner thereafter applied for appointment on compassionate ground, on which opinion was sought by the Government from the Law Secretary and, in turn, on 10.4.2006 the opinion of the Special Secretary (Law) has already been given. The petitioner contends that the matter is now pending before the State Government but despite several years having passed and the petitioner having filed several representations, no decision has yet been taken.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation, along with a certified copy of this order and photostat copies of all the requisite documents, before the Respondent no.1, the same shall be considered and decided by the said Respondent no.1, in accordance with law, within a period of two months of the filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observation/direction this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost.

dt. 6.4.2007

dps

w.p. 18142.07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.