Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHANCHAL & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Chanchal & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 8063 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 652 (11 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2007 has been filed by Babu Ram, Sita Ram, Dinesh and Dev against the judgment and order dated 21.12.2006 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 1, Moradabad in S. T. No. 1165 of 1999 whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted under Section 307/34 IPC and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous  imprisonment for seven years and fine has also been imposed on them.

Criminal Appeal No. 8063 of 2006 has been filed by Chanchal, Chhattara, Naraina, Khajan, Vijay, Hukum Singh and Gulab against the judgement and order dated 21.12.2006 passed by same court in S. T. No. 1044 of 2003 whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 147, 307/149, 148, 506(2) IPC and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and fine has also been imposed on them with default stipulation. These two appeals arise out of the two cross cases and therefore it be connected together.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgement.

Admit.

In the circumstances of the case, appellants shall continue on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

The realisation of fine as against the appellants shall remain stayed during pendency of this appeal. They shall shall also furnish an undertaking that they will not indulge in any criminal or anti social activity and if any report is found against them it shall be open for the court below to report to this court so that their bail may be cancelled.

Dated:11.1.2007

RKS/57/07

8063/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.