Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BRIJ NANDAN versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Brij Nandan v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 18532 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6676 (12 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.

By this writ petition  the petitioner has prayed for commanding the  respondent to regularise the services of the petitioner as seasonal collection peon.  Petitioner's case in the writ petition  is that he was engaged  as seasonal collection peon in the year 1985 and is working from time to time.  The petitioner himself has filed order dated 29th November, 2006 in which thirty one seasonal collection peons have been mentioned who have been given regular appointment.  Although the petitioner's counsel contended that certain junior seasonal collection peons have been named in the order but no relief has been claimed against the order dated 29.11.2006.  The State Government has issued a  Government order  providing 50% of vacancy of collection peons  are to be filled up from the seasonal collection peons.  In view of above the petitioner is thus entitled for consideration of regular appointment  as and when exercise is taken for  giving regular appointment to the seasonal collection peons.  

In view of above the writ petition  is disposed of with the observations that as and when exercise is undertaken for filing up the post of Collection peons  from the seasonal collection peons, the name of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with his seniority and eligibility.

The writ petition  is disposed of with the above observations.

D/-12.4.2007

SCS/18532


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.