High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Fatma Begum v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 18510 of 2007  RD-AH 6690 (12 April 2007)
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner.
By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the advertisement dated 30.12.2006 issued by Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari, Phoolpur, District Allahabad inviting applications for he appointment of Anganbari Karyakatri of village Sarvadesh. Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that the petitioner was selected but on the basis of some complaint appointment letter was not issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made several representations to the authorities to give reasons for not appointing the petitioner but no decision was communicated. He submits that fresh advertisement has wrongly been issued.
I have considered the submission of counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
Although in the writ petition the petitioner has claimed that she was selected for Anganbari Karyakatri, the counsel for the petitioner himself stated that the appointment letter was not issued on account of some complaint. He submits that certain enquiries were conducted on the complaint. The petitioner having not been appointed nor any appointment letter was issued, no grounds have been made to quash the advertisement. However, as contended by the petitioner that she has submitted various representations to the authorities, the said representations may be considered and the decision be communicated to the petitioner in accordance with law.
With the above observations the writ petition is dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.