Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RISHI KUMAR VISHWAKARMA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rishi Kumar Vishwakarma v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6926 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 6736 (12 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

Accused Rishi Kumar Vishwakarma son of Rakesh Kumar Vishwakarma has prayed for release on bail in Case Crime No. 2 of2007, under Sections 427, 380, 406, 506 IPC, P.S. Malwan, District Fatehpur.

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that co accused Rakesh Kumar Vishwakarma has been directed to be released on bail in criminal misc. bail application No. 2584 of 2007 by another bench of this Court vide order dated 8.2.2007. He has also contended that applicant is son of Rakesh Kumar Vishwakarma and is similarly situate.

In the circumstances of the case, but without prejudice to the merit of the case, applicant is entitled to bail.

Let the accused involved in above case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The applicant shall furnish an undertaking before the court concerned that he will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and will not cause either any direct or indirect threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and his family members and shall also not tamper with the evidence.  If any such report is made by any of the above persons either to the court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into and if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to take legal necessary action against the applicant.

Dated: 12.4.2007.

RKS/6926/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.