Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DHARM WATI & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dharm Wati & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 9709 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 6833 (16 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

                                                                                Court No. 36

                    Crl. Misc. Writ Petition no. 9709 of  2005

Smt. Jamuna Devi . . . . . . . .  .  . . .  . .   . . . . . . . .  .  Petitioner.

                                 Versus

State of U.P.  and others  . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . .  . . .  Respondents.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

        ----

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble R.K. Rastogi,J.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition with allegation that her husband was arrested  in the night intervening 20/21.4.2005 and thereafter  because of police atrocities he died  on 21.4.2005. The petitioner filed an application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. On this application  an order was passed on 8.7.2005 for registration and investigation of the case. Respondents no. 2 to 4 filed a revision against the order dated 8.7.2005. In this revision initially the order dated 8.7.2005 was stayed. Thereafter present writ petition  was filed for a direction to the respondents to  enquire into custodial death of the petitioner's husband.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A for the State.

It is not disputed that the revision filed  by respondents no.2 to 4  was dismissed. There is now no hindrance  in proceeding further  with the  investigation of the matter. Considering the nature of the allegations it will be open to the petitioner  to file an application before respondent no.1  for transferring the investigation to  any other authority. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, respondent no.1  shall pass appropriate order at an early date, if possible within one month.

With these  observations, the writ petition is disposed off.

Dated:16.4.2007

RPP.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.