Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM BABOO ALIAS KALLU AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Baboo Alias Kallu And Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3500 of 2005 [2007] RD-AH 6871 (16 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.

Hon'ble Shiv Charan, J.  

This appeal is listed today for considering the prayer for bail on behalf of  the appellant nos. 1 and 3. Appellant nos. 2 and 4 have already been released on bail by this Court.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the lower court record and the order of Sessions Judge.

It is contended by learned counsel for the appellants that according to the prosecution case two persons are alleged to have fired upon the deceased but the post-mortem examination report shows only one firearm injury. The presence of the informant is highly doubtful. It is also stated that accused had also fired upon the eye witness but he did not receive any injury and the report is also lodged after about 5 hours.  

The appeal has already been admitted on 18.8.2005 and it was observed that prayer for bail on behalf of appellant nos. 1 and 3 shall be considered after the receipt of the lower court record.

The appeal is not likely to be listed for final hearing in near future.  

Considering the facts and circumstances, we find that the appellant nos. 1 and 3 are admitted to bail.

Pending appeal, the appellant nos. 1 and 3 namely Ram Baboo @ Kallu and Kallu, convicted and sentenced in S.T. No. 411 of 2002 (State Vs. Ram Babu & others) shall be released on bail on their each executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the C.J.M., Kanpur Dehat.

Realisation of fine shall remain stayed.  

Dated : 16.4.2007

S.B.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.