Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. ANITA DEVI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Anita Devi v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 1578 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 718 (11 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Koraon, as respondent no. 6 in the array of respondent forthwith.

Contention of the petitioner is that Smt.  Phool Kali Devi, respondent no. 5 has succeeded in procuring  appointment on the post of Aanganbari Karayatri by getting income certificate showing her to be from below poverty line category. Petitioner has contended that said income certificate is procured one and far away from truth. Petitioner has further contended the moment aforesaid certificate is ignored it is petitioner who is to be offered appointment on the basis of merit.

As to whether Smt.  Phool Kali Devi, respondent no. 5 has procured income certificate by furnishing correct or incorrect facts is the essentially question of fact  and the same can be very well looked into and remedied by the competent authority i.e. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Koraon, respondent no. 6.

In these circumstances and in this background liberty is given to the petitioner to make fresh representation within three weeks from today alongwith the certified copy of this order before Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Koraon, respondent no. 6 who shall consider the claim of the petitioner and take appropriate decision on the same, after providing opportunity of hearing to Smt.  Phool Kali Devi, respondent no. 5, in accordance with law  preferably within six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. Whatever decision so taken, same be communicated to the petitioner.

With the above direction present writ petition is disposed of.      

11th Jan 2007

Dhruv(1578)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.