JEEV DHAN & ANOTHER versus DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, MAU & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Jeev Dhan & Another v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation, Mau & Others - WRIT - B No. 9268 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 7501 (24 April 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

    Case called out in revised list.

   Office report dated  23.4.2007 indicates that the petitioner has not taken steps for service on opposite parties 4 to 13. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court against these opposite parties as these opposite parties appeared to be the contesting respondents in whose absence the writ petition cannot be effectively decided.

      The writ petition as a whole dismissed.

24.4.2007.

s.wp.9268/07.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.