Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ARSHAD ALI versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Arshad Ali v. State Of U.P. & Another - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 441 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 759 (12 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.45

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 441 OF 2007

Arshad Ali..........................................Petitioner.

                                     Versus

State of U.P. and another................... ....Respondents.

Hon. Mrs. Poonam Srivastav, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

The award of interim maintenance in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is impugned in the instant writ petition. Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that Rs.1,500/- per month towards maintenance was awarded ex parte previously vide order dated 11.1.2005. A recall application was moved, and the same has been allowed subject to payment of Rs.1,000/- per month towards maintenance vide order dated 16.3.2005. This order was challenged in revision and the same has been dismissed on 13.12.2006. Both the orders are impugned in the instant writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that nothing has been deposited so far.

The instant writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that (1) the petitioner shall deposit interim maintenance w.e.f. 16.3.2005 at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month within a period of three months from today. First installment shall be deposited by 30.1.2007, second installment by 30.2.2007 and third by 30.3.2007. In addition to this deposit, Rs.1,000/- per month shall also be deposited as an interim maintenance by 10th day of each month regularly. (2) The amount so deposited by the petitioner shall be disbursed to the respondent no.2 without any security. (3) In the event of deposit of entire amount of maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- by 30.3.2007, the Magistrate shall make every endeavour to complete the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. without granting any adjournment to the either parties within another three months i.e. by June, 2007. (4) In the event of default on the part of the petitioner, liberty granted shall come to an end automatically.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of.

Dt. 12.1.2007

rkg


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.