Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

INAYAT ALI versus STATE OF U.P.& OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Inayat Ali v. State Of U.P.& Others - WRIT - A No. 15514 of 2000 [2007] RD-AH 7620 (25 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

                                                                               Court No.31

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15514 of 2000

Inayat Ali Vs. State of U.P. & others

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Pleadings have been exchanged and with consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage.

The petitioner is a Sub-Inspector in the Civil Police. The grievance of the petitioner is that he ought to have been promoted as Circle Inspector in the Civil Police from the date his juniors had been promoted.

In the counter affidavit, it has specifically been stated that promotion to the petitioner has not been granted as he had not completed the requisite period of posting as Station Officer. It has been stated that for consideration of promotion of a Sub Inspector to the post of Circle Inspector, the mandatory requirement is that he ought to have been posted as Station Officer for three years. At the relevant time, the petitioner is said to have completed only two years and five months as Station Officer. In the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, it has been stated that during pendency of this writ petition, the aforesaid period of three years as Station Officer has been completed by the petitioner and thus he would now be entitled to be considered for promotion as Circle Inspector.

Without going into further merits of this case, in the aforesaid facts, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner for promotion as Circle Inspector may be reconsidered and if the petitioner is now found to be eligible for promotion to the post of Circle Inspector, the same may be granted to him in accordance with law, within three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order before the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Police Head Quarter, Allahabad, respondent no.3. The petitioner is given liberty to also file a comprehensive representation, annexing there with all the requisite documents in support of his claim.  

With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to cost.    

Dt/-25.4.2007

Ru

             


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.