High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Natthu Yadav v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3656 of 2006  RD-AH 7796 (26 April 2007)
Court No. 44
Criminal Appeal No. 3656 of 2006
Natthu Yadav ......... Appellant
State of U.P. ..........Opp. Party
Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.
Hon'ble Shiv Charan, J.
A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the appellant who has been convicted by the trial court under Section 364-A I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 5000/-.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the lower court record and the order of Sessions Judge.
It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant was not named in the first information report and he was not put up for identification.
On the contrary learned A.G.A. submits that the victim, after his release from the abductees, disclosed the name of the appellant as an abductor, who was known to him prior to the occurrence and he also identified him in Court. There is no reason for falsely implicating the appellant by the victim.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in our opinion, it is not a fit case for grant of bail.
Prayer for bail is rejected.
Dated : 26.4.2007
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.