Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ISHRAT ALI & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ishrat Ali & Others v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 299 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 785 (12 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble  R.C. Deepak, J.

Hon'ble V.K.Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,  learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the husband of the victim has already been released on bail. The petitioners are parents-in-law, sister-in-law and Jeth of the victim. They have nothing to do with the demand of dowry.      

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in case the investigation into the case crime no. 226 of 2006  under Section 498, 34 IPC  PS Dombiwali , Distt. Thane (Maharashtra) has not been concluded, the same shall be concluded within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of the order and till then the arrest of the petitioners shall not be effected, provided they co-operate with the investigation.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Dt/- 12th  January 2007

PKG/15 (308/07)

Hon'ble  R.C. Deepak, J.

Hon'ble V.K.Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,  learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are Jeth, Jethani and brother-in-law of the victim. They did not make any demand of dowry or extend any torture to the victim, as alleged in the impugned FIR but pursuant to the impugned FIR, the police is trying to effect their arrest. They are ready to co-operate with the investigation.      

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, issue notice to respondent no.3 to file counter affidavit within two days days. The same is also given to the investigating officer for the purpose.

List on 1.2.2007.

The investigation of case crime no. C-532 of 2006 under Section 498A, 323, 506 IPC and ¾ D.P. Act  PS Kheta Sarai, Distt. Jaunpur shall go on but the arrest of the petitioners shall not be effected till the date fixed, provided they co-operate with the investigation.

Dt/- 12th  January 2007

PKG/16 (299/07)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.