Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.H. RAI versus D.E.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.H. Rai v. D.E. - WRIT - A No. 5465 of 1994 [2007] RD-AH 8046 (30 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.26

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5465 of 1994

Param Hans Rai             versus      The Director of Education

                                                      U.P. Education Finance

                                                       Anubhag-1, Allahabad

                                                        others.

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The only controversy raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is that he has not been paid revised pay scale as revised from time to time by the State Government.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise was entered into between the petitioner and the Committee of Management. Civil Suit No. 33 of 1976 filed by the petitioner was decided in terms of the aforesaid compromise.  Accordingly, the petitioner made representations dated 1.1.83, 5.11.91, 9.3.92 and 16.7.1991 for payment of revised pay scale to the Committee of Management as well as the DIOS,Mahrajganj  which have remained unactioned till date and his salary for the aforesaid period has not been paid to him.

The counsel for the petitioner states that similarly situated persons have been given revised pay scale but the claim of the petitioner has not been considered by the authority concerned, hence a direction may be issued to the authority concerned for deciding the representation of the petitioner within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The Standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

Perusal of the aforesaid alleged representations by the petitioner show that the said representations are only the letters addressed by the petitioner to the Committee of Management as well as the DIOS but no basis or details have been given in the aforesaid letters in support of the claim of the petitioner.

In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction that in case the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the DIOS Mahrajganj within one month from today, the same shall be decided by him by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

Dated 30.4.2007

CPP/-

           


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.