Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAVI DAHIYA versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ravi Dahiya v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 7880 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8070 (30 April 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

Heard Sri Vivek K. Singh, Sri Ajay K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

From the record, it transpires that the applicant-accused Ravi  Dahiya was on bail but he became absent and hence non-bailable warrants were issued against him and his bail was also cancelled. Now the applicant-accused Ravi Dahiya is in Jail since 28.03.2007.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that reasons shown by the applicant for his absence are sufficient and hence he should be granted bail so that he may defend himself effectively.

The bail has been opposed by learned A.G.A. contending that if the applicant is granted bail, then he shall abscond again.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view all the facts and circumstances of the case, for the end of justice, one opportunity more may be granted to the applicant to remain on bail but subject to certain conditions so that the trial may be concluded without delay.

Let the applicant Ravi Dahiya  S/o  Shri Ram Charan involved in Case Crime No. 296 of 2001, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. T.P.Nagar, District Meerut be released on bail subject to following conditions on his executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned:-

1.The applicant shall furnish an undertaking that he will not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court concerned without seeking prior permission in writing.

2.The applicant shall also furnish an undertaking that he shall attend the trial Court on every date and he shall not indulge himself in anti-social and criminal activities.

30.04.2007

YC/Crl. Misc. Bail application No. 7880 of 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.