Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NARENDRA LAL AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Narendra Lal And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 752 of 1986 [2007] RD-AH 8166 (1 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 39

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.752 of 1986

Narendra Lal and others

Versus

State of U.P. and others

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla.J.

Petitioners in this present case have approached this Court for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to enforce and implement the seniority list of the clerks of the Collectorate of District Azamgarh which is already prepared and circulated and framed by the respondent no. 3 as per his letter dated 17/24th September, 1984 and further for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to implement the illegal and unwarranted interference of the State Government by way of its letter dated 08th October, 1985 to prepare the seniority list only for the post, 1972 employees.

Present writ petition has been filed in the year 1986 and it has been accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that thereafter seniority list has been prepared and same has been circulated in the department concerned. Once seniority list has been prepared and circulated in the department concerned and the said seniority list is holding the field for such a long period then at this juncture after more than 20 years relief which has been claimed by the petitioner cannot be accorded to them. One more reason for not according the relief is that the beneficiary of the said seniority list are not at before this Court.

Consequently present writ petition lacks substance and is dismissed.

01st May, 2007

Dhruv

   


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.