Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHAMMAD SAMIM versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohammad Samim v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 21492 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 8285 (2 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 39

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.21492 of 2007

Mohammad Samim

Versus

State of U.P. and others

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla.J.

Earlier the petitioner had approached this Court by preferring Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 9828 of 2007. This Court on 23.02.2007 asked the District Magistrate, concerned to consider the matter. Thereafter matter has been considered by the District Magistrate  and the appointment which has been made on the post of Shiksha Mitra has been found to be valid.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended with vehemence that in the present case Jitendra Kumar Gupta has not at all submitted application form well within time as such his claim has been illegally rejected.

From the side of the respondents it has been contended that after the record has been examined, rightful conclusion has been arrived at as such no interference be made.

After respective arguments have been advanced factual position which is emerging is to the effect that pursuant to directives issued by this Court the District Magistrate has examined the matter and has found that in all 11 forms have been received in time and thereafter in the meeting of Gram Shiksha Samiti passed resolution was passed on 10.10.2006 and on the basis of quality point marks Jitendra Kumar Gupta has been selected. Once this finding of fact has been returned, then there is no occasion to interfere with the impugned order.

Consequently present writ petition lacks substance and is dismissed.

Dated: 2nd May, 2007

 Dhruv


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.